TIC 4.0
Equivalent Moves Per Hour
KPI
Fields | Type | Description | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
ID (KPI identifier) | M | Equivalent Moves Per Hour (EMPH) | GRAMMAR |
KPI name | M | Equivalent Moves Per Hour | GRAMMAR |
KPI type | M | OperationalPerformance | GRAMMAR |
Applicable to |
| Crane, Terminal, CraneOperations, STS Cranes |
|
Also known as | O |
| TIC Description |
Definition | M | Equivalent Moves Per Hour (EMPH) measures a Ship-to-Shore (STS) quay crane's operational productivity adjusted for crane size, expressed as equivalent moves per hour on a standard reference crane. | TIC Description |
Further Detail | O | 1. Context and rationale Industry practice uses GMPH and NMPH to assess crane productivity. However, a crane with 65 m outreach and a crane with 48 m outreach reporting the same NMPH are not performing equally — the larger crane moves its spreader through significantly more space per cycle. Without size normalization, cross-terminal benchmarking does not account for differences in crane size. EMPH exists to answer one question that no current KPI addresses: How well is this crane performing relative to its physical size? 2. Measurement Definitions All measurements shall be taken from the crane's design drawings or specification sheet. The following definitions apply:
The crane's working envelope is characterized by its Reference Path Length (RPL): the total distance the spreader travels in one standardized reference cycle. Two RPL variants account for the two primary terminal configurations. RPL-P (Portal drop): Container is set down between the crane legs (portal centerline, also known as mid span). The trolley travels from the seaside pick position at 80% of outreach, across the waterside rail, to the portal centerline at half the rail span. The cycle includes the outbound and return trolley trip, plus four hoist motions: hoist loaded, lower loaded, hoist empty, and lower empty.
RPL-B (Backreach drop): Container is set down on the landside of the crane, beyond the legs. The trolley travels from the seaside pick position at 80% of outreach, across the waterside rail, across the full rail span, past the landside rail, and out to the designated landside container exchange point. Some terminals use this configuration because the portal area is used for hatch cover storage.
Reference crane dimensions:
Reference RPL-P = 2 × (0.8 × 55 + 0.5 × 30) + 4 × (0.8 × 46) = 2 × (44 + 15) + 4 × 36.8 = 118.0 + 147.2 = 265.2 m Reference RPL-B = 2 × (0.8 × 55 + 30 + 15) + 4 × (0.8 × 46) = 2 × (44 + 30 + 15) + 4 × 36.8 = 178.0 + 147.2 = 325.2 m RPL values may also be used independently as a standardized crane size descriptor for comparing STS cranes across fleets. Terminals shall use RPL-P or RPL-B consistently based on their operational configuration. When reporting EMPH, the RPL type used shall be stated.
EMPH converts observed NMPH into equivalent moves per hour on the reference crane:
The ratio RPL_crane / RPL_ref is a size adjustment factor. If the crane is larger than the reference, the ratio is greater than 1 and the crane receives a modest credit because its spreader covers more distance per cycle. If the crane is smaller, the ratio is less than 1, reflecting that each move involves less physical work. The output remains in moves per hour, the unit operators already think in, adjusted so that cranes of different sizes are compared on equal terms.
A full physics-based cycle time (QC-NCT) requires 14+ crane-specific inputs including rated speeds, acceleration profiles, motion overlap capability, anti-sway settling times, and spreader lock/unlock durations. While precise, this approach creates standardization challenges:
Reference Path Length captures the dominant variable, geometry, with a small number of measurements that can be verified from any crane specification or drawing, making it straightforward to implement across terminals. It provides approximately 80% of the normalization accuracy of a full cycle time calculation.
EMPH sits within a layered throughput framework:
EMPH supports:
EMPH is a performance KPI. It describes observed, size-normalized productivity. It is not a capacity estimate. Capacity modeling requires additional assumptions (staffing, availability, utilization, TEU mix, peak factors) that are outside the scope of this metric.
| TIC Description |
Required Information | M |
| TIC Description |
SUBJECT |
| terminal, STS, TT, CHE, berth |
|
CONCEPT |
|
|
|
Value |
| Comparative moves per hour during crane execution |
|
Related standards | O |
| TIC Description |
Related TIC 4.0 definition | O | TIC Description | |
Example | M | Portal drop example (RPL-P): Crane A: O = 65 m, S = 30 m, H = 50 m, NMPH = 28 RPL-P = 2 × (0.8 × 65 + 0.5 × 30) + 4 × (0.8 × 50) = 2 × 67.0 + 160.0 = 134.0 + 160.0 = 294.0 m EMPH = 28 × (294.0 / 265.2) = 31.0 EMPH Crane B: O = 48 m, S = 25 m, H = 38 m, NMPH = 28 RPL-P = 2 × (0.8 × 48 + 0.5 × 25) + 4 × (0.8 × 38) = 2 × 50.9 + 121.6 = 101.8 + 121.6 = 223.4 m EMPH = 28 × (223.4 / 265.2) = 23.6 EMPH Both report 28 NMPH. Crane A moves its spreader through 32% more space per cycle. EMPH makes this visible. Backreach drop example (RPL-B): Crane C: O = 65 m, S = 30 m, H = 50 m, B = 18 m, NMPH = 24 RPL-B = 2 × (0.8 × 65 + 30 + 18) + 4 × (0.8 × 50) = 2 × 100.0 + 160.0 = 200.0 + 160.0 = 360.0 m EMPH = 24 × (360.0 / 325.2) = 26.6 EMPH Crane D: O = 48 m, S = 25 m, H = 38 m, B = 12 m, NMPH = 24 RPL-B = 2 × (0.8 × 48 + 25 + 12) + 4 × (0.8 × 38) = 2 × 75.4 + 121.6 = 150.8 + 121.6 = 272.4 m EMPH = 24 × (272.4 / 325.2) = 20.1 EMPH Both report 24 NMPH on backreach. Crane C is doing significantly more work per cycle due to its longer trolley path. EMPH reveals the difference. Reference crane: O = 55 m, S = 30 m, H = 46 m, B = 15 m | TIC Description |
Example in the context of the grammar | M | Portal drop example (RPL-P): Crane A: O = 65 m, S = 30 m, H = 50 m, NMPH = 28 RPL-P = 2 × (0.8 × 65 + 0.5 × 30) + 4 × (0.8 × 50) = 2 × 67.0 + 160.0 = 134.0 + 160.0 = 294.0 m EMPH = 28 × (294.0 / 265.2) = 31.0 EMPH Crane A: che|stsA@|size|outreach|value= 65 RPL-P = 2 x (0.8 x che|stsA@|size|outreach|value= 65 + 0.5 x che|stsA@|size|railspan|value= 30) + 4 x (0.8 x che|stsA@|size|maxhoistheight= 50) = 2 x 67 + 160 = 134 + 160 = 294m EMPH = 28 x (294.0/265.2) = 31.0 Crane B: che|stsA@|size|outreach|value= 48 RPL-P = 2 x (0.8 x che|stsA@|size|outreach|value= 48 + 0.5 x che|stsA@|size|railspan|value= 25) + 4 x (0.8 x che|stsA@|size|maxhoistheight= 38) = 2 x 50 + 121.6 = 101.8 + 121.6 = 223.4m EMPH = 28 x (223.4/265.2) = 23.6 EMPH Both report 28 NMPH. Crane A moves its spreader through 32% more space per cycle. EMPH makes this visible. | TIC Description |
Search tags | M | quay throughput, crane productivity, vessel ops | Technical |
Version / Date | M | 20260428 | Technical |
Internal TIC Version | M | 2026.019 | Technical |
Created by | Edited by | Review / Approve | Published |
@Nic Westgate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|